Categories
AI Enablement

Resolving Slow Personalization via Automation

Jan ’25 – Jun ’25

Situation

Manual content personalization took 2+ hours per asset, from account research to copy-pasting and rewriting messaging, capping output at 2-3 assets per day and causing missed opportunities and team burnout.

Task

Build a pipeline that extracts account context, scores fit, and generates tailored on-brand content.

Actions

Choices & Considerations


I built a TypeScript CLI orchestrating seven specialized AI agents, including an extractor, a scorer, and a content generator, rather than one monolithic prompt, so each stage could be tested, cached, and swapped independently. For ingestion I chose a dual extraction strategy, structured data first (JSON-LD) with an AI fallback for unstructured pages, which kept cost low on clean sources and coverage high on messy ones. I added a configurable criteria-based scoring layer so the team could define what a good-fit account looks like and spend generation effort only where it mattered, and I used Claude for tailoring with two switchable voice modes (leader and builder) to match different buyer personas. A final agent produced structured talking points for sales conversations using the STAR method. The flow was: Source Page → Extract (JSON-LD, AI fallback) → Score (criteria) → Generate (persona mode) → Prep Materials, with logging and caching at every stage.

Tradeoffs

I gave up the simplicity of a single prompt and accepted the overhead of orchestrating multiple agents, plus a CLI-first interface instead of a polished UI. That was worth it at pre-seed, where speed to a working system and the ability to iterate on each stage mattered far more than interface polish. I also accepted some staleness risk from aggressive caching in exchange for a large cut in redundant API calls and cost.

Lessons Learned

I would define the scoring criteria and quality bar with the client’s go-to-market team before writing any agent code, and add human-review checkpoints and an evaluation set earlier, since I tuned output quality by feel before I had a systematic way to measure it.

Result

I cut per-asset personalization time from 2+ hours to 15-20 minutes, a 10x gain that took output from 2-3 to 20-30 tailored assets per day, with a 2-3x lift in response rates.

Categories
AI Enablement

Fixing Slow Development Via GenAI

Jan ’23 – Jan ’24

Situation

Amid growing pressure to ship faster and better, I saw an opportunity to leverage Generative AI to boost engineering velocity for myself and the broader team, requiring more than just tool adoption.

Tasks

Weave these AI tools into the daily engineering workflow in a truly meaningful and impactful way.

Actions

In January of 2023, I personally started adopting GenAI tools like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to speed up development tasks and unblock myself more quickly.

I dove into self-learning, starting with prompt engineering. I documented everything I learned in a technical wiki, ultimately creating a living prompt catalog inside ClickUp Docs—complete with zero-shot, one-shot, and parameterized examples.

As I discovered high-impact use cases—like writing boilerplate code, summarizing documentation, or drafting test cases—I shared these insights during informal lunch-and-learns.

These sessions served as low-friction, high-impact ways to scale adoption and raise the team’s confidence in experimenting with AI.

Result

Decreased cycle time by 35%